Olfactory function after mild traumatic brain injury in children-a longitudinal case control study.

The prevalence of posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction in children after mild traumatic brain injury ranges from 3 to 58%, with potential factors influencing this variation, including traumatic brain injury severity and assessment methods. This prospective longitudinal study examines the association between mild traumatic brain injury and olfactory dysfunction in children. Seventy-five pediatric patients with mild traumatic brain injury and an age-matched healthy control group were enrolled. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks battery, which focuses on olfactory threshold and odor identification. The study found that children with mild traumatic brain injury had impaired olfactory function compared with healthy controls, particularly in olfactory threshold scores. The prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in the patient group was 33% and persisted for 1 yr. No significant association was found between traumatic brain injury symptoms (e.g. amnesia, loss of consciousness) and olfactory dysfunction. The study highlights the importance of assessing olfactory function in children after mild traumatic brain injury, given its potential impact on daily life. Although most olfactory dysfunction appears transient, long-term follow-up is essential to fully understand the recovery process. The findings add valuable insights to the limited literature on this topic and urge the inclusion of olfactory assessments in the management of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.

Olfactory training effects in children after mild traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) might impair the sense of smell and cognitive functioning. Repeated, systematic exposure to odors, i.e., olfactory training (OT) has been proposed for treatment of olfactory dysfunctions, including post-traumatic smell loss. Additionally, OT has been shown to mitigate cognitive deterioration in older population and enhance selected cognitive functions in adults. We aimed to investigate olfactory and cognitive effects of OT in the pediatric population after mTBI, likely to exhibit cognitive and olfactory deficits. METHODS: Our study comprised 159 children after mTBI and healthy controls aged 6-16 years (M = 9.68 ± 2.78 years, 107 males), who performed 6-months-long OT with a set of 4 either high- or low-concentrated odors. Before and after OT we assessed olfactory functions, fluid intelligence, and executive functions. RESULTS: OT with low-concentrated odors increased olfactory sensitivity in children after mTBI. Regardless of health status, children who underwent OT with low-concentrated odors had higher fluid intelligence scores at post-training measurement, whereas scores of children performing OT with high-concentrated odors did not change. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that OT with low-concentrated odors might accelerate rehabilitation of olfactory sensitivity in children after mTBI and support cognitive functions in the area of fluid intelligence regardless of head trauma.

MUC-FIRE: Study protocol for a randomized multicenter open-label controlled trial to show that MUCous FIstula REfeeding reduces the time from enterostomy closure to full enteral feeds.

Background: After enterostomy creation, the distal bowel to the ostomy is excluded from the physiologic passage of stool, nutrient uptake, and growth of this intestinal section. Those infants frequently require long-term parenteral nutrition, continued after enterostomy reversal due to the notable diameter discrepancy of the proximal and distal bowel. Previous studies have shown that mucous fistula refeeding (MFR) results in faster weight gain in infants. The aim of the randomized multicenter open-label controlled MUCous FIstula REfeeding ("MUC-FIRE") trial is to demonstrate that MFR between enterostomy creation and reversal reduces the time to full enteral feeds after enterostomy closure compared to controls, resulting in shorter hospital stay and less adverse effects of parenteral nutrition. Methods/Design: A total of 120 infants will be included in the MUC-FIRE trial. Following enterostomy creation, infants will be randomized to either an intervention or a non-intervention group.In the intervention group, perioperative MFR between enterostomy creation and reversal will be performed. The control group receives standard care without MFR.The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is the time to full enteral feeds. Secondary endpoints include first postoperative bowel movement after stoma reversal, postoperative weight gain, and days of postoperative parenteral nutrition. In addition adverse events will be analyzed. Discussion: The MUC-FIRE trial will be the first prospective randomized trial to investigate the benefits and disadvantages of MFR in infants. The results of the trial are expected to provide an evidence-based foundation for guidelines in pediatric surgical centers worldwide. Trial registration: The trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (number: NCT03469609, date of registration: March 19, 2018; last update: January 20, 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03469609?term=NCT03469609&draw=2&rank=1).